Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ann Li vs Eliz Maloney Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Maloney analysis and find out who is favored!
Ann Li vs Eliz Maloney Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Li 0 - 0 Maloney
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 45.68% of points on their second serve, while Maloney has won 41.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 56.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maloney has won 56.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.23% and 39.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 57.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maloney has saved 55.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 56.67% of matches played (W/L 34/ 26), with Maloney winning 30.77% (W/L 8/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14). Maloney has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 26/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17), where as Maloney has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 30.77% of matches (W/L 8/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.72 while Maloney has played against players with an average rank of 179.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maloney has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 49.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maloney has converted 47.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
143
Rank
44
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
371
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
59% (207-141)
Career Total W/L
54% (103-88)
56% (19-15)
YTD W/L
36% (5-9)
$1,188,186
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ann Li vs Eliz Maloney For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Li VS Maloney
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ann Li | Eliz Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (19/15) | 36% (5/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (46/39) | 37% (11/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (403/373) | 46% (123/144) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 43% (3/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:26 | 1:16:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 262.41 | 210.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1547/2613) | 72% (519/723) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (962/1547) | 60% (309/519) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (487/1066) | 41% (84/204) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (156/316) | 48% (39/82) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1160/2532) | 45% (327/729) |
| Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (15/10) | 36% (5/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 36% (5/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 0% (9/0) |
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Dominika Salkova
Player
Ann Li
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
81)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Elvina Kalieva
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Martina Trevisan
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Ann Li
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Isabella Shinikova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Ann Li
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
65 of
83)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eliz Maloney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Eliz Maloney
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Eliz Maloney
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliz Maloney
Player
Sophya Devas
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
11
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Holly Hutchinson
Player
Eliz Maloney
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliz Maloney
Player
Annabelle Lammas
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Eliz Maloney
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Eliz Maloney
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliz Maloney
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Maloney Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Li are available here and Maloney photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
